Search for: "People v High"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 15,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
In times of plenty, people avoid going to court and spend their time making money through commercial exploitation. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
(Alito did not ask about high cheekbones.) [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Furthermore, even some restrictions on knowing falsehoods involve an unusually high risk of factfinder error, factfinder bias, prosecutorial bias, legislator bias, or interference with scientific or historical investigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Furthermore, even some restrictions on knowing falsehoods involve an unusually high risk of factfinder error, factfinder bias, prosecutorial bias, legislator bias, or interference with scientific or historical investigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
That is, the Constitution does not afford people positive rights, but merely prevents the government from infringing such pre-existing freedoms. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm
How Bad Has Kreiner v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am
” Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of the 50th anniversary of Loving v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:21 pm
EPA, and North Dakota v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:19 am
In Williams v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
In this post I want to just briefly outline the reasoning in the case and reflect on what significance, if any, it might have for our forthcoming Supreme Court case of Zappone & Gilligan v Revenue Commissioners (High Court judgment). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
High Court judge Lord Carloway was asked to review Scotland’s criminal justice system. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:37 am
There follows a statement that no High Court judge has published memoirs before retiring and another statement “the most important thing about judges is they must prove to be people who can exercise judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:19 am
Galarneau v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
(People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:41 pm
See Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
Some people somewhere had set their sights very broadly. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
* JuicyCampus redux: People's Dirt. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:16 pm
The court held that there had been a breach of Article 10 where he had been tried in criminal proceedings for criticising high-ranking members of the military. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 21 and 22 March 2023, there was a hearing before High Court Judge Heather Williams in the case of Prismall v (1) Google (2) Deep Mind. [read post]
