Search for: "People v. Bounds"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 3,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2008, 5:35 pm
See Molski v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 7:24 am
In Garza v. [read post]
KY: Pulling down handcuffed defendant's pants to search for crack felt in a patdown was unreasonable
13 Nov 2008, 6:31 pm
Bell v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
We are all enormously grateful to Christine Korsgaard for her characteristically lucid and insightful lecture on the basis of animal entitlements. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:40 pm
Further, the Court cited Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:35 pm
On the other, it seems that the American people have already accepted that justices make decisions according to their own policy preferences. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
However, as UK law stands there is no current legal duty on editors to inform people such as Mr Mosley prior to publication. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:16 pm
Union of India v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:15 pm
Supreme Court's teachings in Daubert v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores can allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligibles. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:36 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
"By accessing this site, you are agreeing to comply with and be bound by the terms of use agreement and privacy policy. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
O'Brien, No. 072312 In a conviction for charges related to attempted robbery, conspiracy to affect interstate commerce, and carrying a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, ruling that machine-gun possession was an element of a crime rather than a sentencing enhancement is affirmed where absent a clearer or more dramatic change in language or legislative history expressing a specific intent to assign judge or jury functions, court is bound by Supreme Court decision, Castillo… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 10:19 am
Gourdine v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 8:56 am
I just read the US Court of Appeals opinion for the Aristocrat v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
Finally, in his closing statement, the prosecutor made several "irrelevant comments which [had] no bearing on any legitimate issue in the case" (People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109) and, in stating that "[p]rosecutors seek justice and juries deliver it in cases such as these," he "exceed[ed] the bounds of legitimate advocacy" (People v Melendez, 11 AD3d 983, 984, lv denied 4 NY3d 888; see People v Benedetto,… [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
In fact, the other three Appellate Divisions have all issued similar decisions (People ex rel Lewis Ward, __ AD3d __, 2008 WL 2051102 [1st Dept 5/1/08]; People ex rel Gerard v Kralik, 2008 NY Slip Op 04895 [2nd Dept 5/27/08]; Prendergast v NYS Dept of Corrections, __ AD3d __, 2008 WL 1902192 [3d Dept 5/1/08]).Seems pretty clear. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:06 pm
" San Diego v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
