Search for: "People v. Friend" Results 3321 - 3340 of 6,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by OBABL Staff
We’ll have to read Professor Maillard’s book “Loving v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
It's ironic that the people leading this mob are some of the same individuals who have repeatedly—and rightly—decried mob justice over the last several years. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that I say “twice” because the proposed law simply calls for “repeatedly committing acts over a period of time,” and “repeatedly” both seems to just mean “more than once,” and has been so interpreted in a closely related telephone harassment statute, see People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 12:36 pm by G.A. Napier
SCOKY refers to this role as that of a Friend of the Court (FOC). [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:48 pm by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
  Now in the recent case of People v Perez, decided December 18, 2017 the Court of Appeal reversed a conviction for a gang crime in a case where there just wasn’t any evidence to support the testimony that it was done for the benefit of the gang. [read post]
10 May 2014, 7:42 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Here is something that needs to be realized not only by attorneys who do this type of work (hopefully they already know) but also people who try to represent themselves or help a relative or friend who has a claim. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:22 am
I just don't believe in mixing the races that way. . . .I have piles and piles of black friends. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:10 am by Mandelman
  And if you live in Washington, please pass a link along to your friends and ask them to support Scott too. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” His accolades and honors are too numerous to mention; they include: Arguing Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:48 pm by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
  Now in the recent case of People v Perez, decided December 18, 2017 the Court of Appeal reversed a conviction for a gang crime in a case where there just wasn’t any evidence to support the testimony that it was done for the benefit of the gang. [read post]