Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 3321 - 3340 of 6,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Excluding a class of people from that institution, therefore, can hardly be considered rational unless it furthers some substantial goal of the state. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Bilkis
Breitstein, v Page 5 Aaronson, 3 AD3d 588 [2d Dept. 2004]; Colicci v Ruhm, 20 AD3d 891 [4th Dept. 2005]), where there is conclusive evidence that the petitioner is not the biological father (Matter of Thomas, 287 AD2d 642 [2d Dept. 2001]), or where the father was temporarily compelled to pay excess support solely due to the court's improper application of the child support statute (People ex rel. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The goal at this stage of the proceedings is solely to determine whether the hearsay in the underlying complaint has been removed. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
See, Scott James Preston, Whistleblowing in Intercollegate Athletics, University Business, March 28, 2012, (discussing Glenn Hedden v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
SSUK also passed on the names of two people who contacted them about volunteering, who then travelled to France and did a day’s work on the Steve Irwin. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:45 am by Nassiri Law
Although some of those claims go as far back as 2000, justices with the Iowa Supreme Court recently ruled plaintiffs would be limited to damages solely from the last two years. [read post]