Search for: "People v. Waits"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 5,499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2016, 7:53 am
On Tuesday, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
Vachaci and US v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:52 am
Reaching back to Hicks v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:53 am
In [an earlier precedent, State v.] [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 1:48 am
But wait, you might be wondering: Wasn't the password here really weak? [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:40 am
This program is limited to 15 people. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:58 pm
Citing Julian V. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:21 am
A few people have sent me the story and wondered whether the government has the authority to do that. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 9:39 am
” Hall v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:18 am
Although the case has a lot of potential to impact gun regulations, that’s what a lot of people thought about Heller (as discussed here), and we’re all still waiting for that to happen. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:05 pm
Come on people, there is a reason the public gets angry with some lawsuits. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:16 am
But wait! [read post]
