Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 3321 - 3340 of 7,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
However, the Court added that a separate application would be advisable if a decision on the point was urgent, but is not necessary as it is clear from the wording in R.223 RoP that such an approach “may” be followed. [1]               Articles 26, 35 and 71, 71a and 71b Brussels Regulation 1215/2012 as amended by EU Regulation 542/2014 More from our authors: Vissers Annotated… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
Peter's School notified a teacher that he spotted a firearm in the school's parking lot. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Peter Margulies and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia weigh in on Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 as follows, 53 Frustration occurs when a situation has arisen for which the parties made no provision in the contract and performance of the contract becomes “a thing radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract”: Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 4:27 pm
At the Consumer Law & Policy Blog, Scott Nelson has this post on the Safeco v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:52 pm by LTA-Editor
” The article surveys U.S. products liability law pertaining to the duty to warn and analyzes the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Rosa v. [read post]