Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 4,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Attorney General John Ashcroft and a cadre of top Bush-era U.S. attorneys is forming a new law firm, an outgrowth of his consulting business. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:32 am
The judge’s 48-page opinion in Gherebi, et al., v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
The officer stated as he arrested the protesters that he was arresting them for violation of the tent ordinance. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
With the government putting its foot down on Lynch, LegalPad's eyes turn to a case in San Jose federal court, Santa Cruz v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:54 pm
Bush, the Supreme Court's landmark decision last term. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:41 am
Stanford student Jacob Heller summarizes Monday's argument in Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:08 am
It is hardly news that the United States does not fit this model, and that since the 2000 election meltdown culminating with the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:44 pm
United States and Nelson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
United States and Nelson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
Gobitis (1940) and West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
Beaty and Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Will EPA and the states be required to address greenhouse gas emissions in federal Title V permits? [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
He said the United States did not use "brute force" and the memos prove detainees weren't tortured. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:10 pm
State, which stands for the proposition that for 3 judges appointed by Jeb Bush, there is little the state can do wrong at trial, including violating a pre-trial motion in limine, and allowing the prosecution to argue at closing evidence that was not introduced at trial. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:59 pm
For example, in a sample of 46 non-affirmative action Equal Protection Clause cases, Justices Thomas and Scalia voted to strike down the law only twice; whereas in Bush v Gore, they struck down the recount on Equal Protection grounds, and the pair struck down 19 out of 19 regulations in affirmative action cases for violating the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
United States (1878) to Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
Bush was also scheduled for the term, but it was dismissed several weeks ago. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 2:07 pm
In Jewel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 6:20 am
In Judge Bates’ ruling on April 2 (see this post), he concluded that the Supreme Court’s decision last June in Boumediene v. [read post]
