Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 21,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:46 am
In the case of Freedom Med., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Whitmer 20-47Issue: Whether a state liquor law that allows in-state retailers to ship wine directly to consumers, but prohibits out-of-state retailers from doing so, is invalid under the nondiscrimination principle of the commerce clause or is a valid exercise of the state’s 21st amendment authority to regulate the sale of alcoholic beverages within its borders. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The decision of Bacardi & Company Limited v Dickinson Distribution Group Pty Ltd [2020] ATMO 117 (1 July 2020) confirms the acceptance of the similarity between goods in classes 32 and 33, and in particular accepts that gin is similar to beer. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The decision of Bacardi & Company Limited v Dickinson Distribution Group Pty Ltd [2020] ATMO 117 (1 July 2020) confirms the acceptance of the similarity between goods in classes 32 and 33, and in particular accepts that gin is similar to beer. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
In Sisvel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:43 am
Grant Cardone, the popular social media influencer, real estate entrepreneur, and sales trainer, is being sued in a class action lawsuit which alleges that he and his company made false and misleading statements and omitted material facts to investors in relation to Cardone Capital LLC’s public offerings in Cardone Equity Fund V, LLC and Cardone Equity Fund VI, LLC. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
Cardone bragged on social media that Cardone Equity Fund V raised $50 million. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
Key Findings Implemented in 1991, Sweden’s carbon tax was one of the first in the world, second only to Finland’s carbon tax, which was implemented a year earlier. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
Hamilton International Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:48 am
However, the holder may have the following rights in relation to the surface of land: i) to enter the mining area and take reasonable measures on or under the surface for the purpose of mining operations; ii) to carry on mining operations and to do all such other acts and things as are necessary for carrying on of those operations; iii) to dispose of any mineral products recovered; … [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 1:44 am
Background The UK Supreme Court delivered the landmark judgment on Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei and ZTE, [2020] UKSC 37 on 26 Aug 2020. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 8:17 am
The district court’s judgment was vacated and the case remanded for trial (Tiffany and Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Ohio (1961), which held that evidence seized unlawfully by the police could not be introduced in a state criminal prosecution, and Gideon v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 7:26 pm
Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 11:11 am
That case is still pending, and another major competition case involving Softbank is around the corner: its contemplated sale of chip company ARM to Nvidia for $40 bilion is likely to draw regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions.While my focus will definitely remain on App Store antitrust cases (as an app developer and antitrust commentator, I'm doubly interested) and component-level licensing of standard-essential patents, the Apple and Intel v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
