Search for: "Shields v. Shields" Results 3321 - 3340 of 6,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 1:14 pm by Howard Ullman
Noting the exception for injuries in adjacent markets if “inextricably intertwined” with the injury sought to be inflicted upon the relevant market or participants, see Blue Shield of Va. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:09 am by Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C.
  In fact, the Alabama Supreme Court, in Roberts v Univ. of Alabama Hospital, held that the amounts a hospital accepts as full payment from Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Medicare and Medicaid are not relevant when considering whether the hospital’s charges are reasonable. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  The opinion also rejects the arguments by the dealers that a state law specifically designed to shield gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers of firearms from lawsuits protects their activities. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Carter Wood
Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:09 am by Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C.
  In fact, the Alabama Supreme Court, in Roberts v Univ. of Alabama Hospital, held that the amounts a hospital accepts as full payment from Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Medicare and Medicaid are not relevant when considering whether the hospital’s charges are reasonable. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:45 am by ipelton
Patent and Trademark Office records): Some of the New England Patriot themed trademarks: - education and entertainment services in the nature of organizing and presenting professional football games and exhibitions; providing sports and entertainment information via a global computer network or a commercial on-line service; organization of sports events; fan club services; educational services, namely, physical education programs and seminars in the field of football; entertainment services,… [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:09 am by Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C.
  In fact, the Alabama Supreme Court, in Roberts v Univ. of Alabama Hospital, held that the amounts a hospital accepts as full payment from Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Medicare and Medicaid are not relevant when considering whether the hospital’s charges are reasonable. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 5:30 am
To answer that question, David turns to Stone v. [read post]