Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California has ruled in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:22 am
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
Click here to read the opinion below in City of Ontario, California v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
Click here to read the opinion below in City of Ontario, California v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:29 am
United States (1996). [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
Defendants removed the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:42 am
The Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari on the substantive constitutional issue in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
But because the Constitution gives Congress authority to govern non-state territories, the Supreme Court’s century-old decision in Grafton v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:58 am
Costco Prevails in First Sale Case Thanks to Copyright MisuseOn November 9, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, per Senior Judge Terry J. [read post]
1 May 2014, 12:55 pm
State of California). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:28 am
In response to instructions from the United States Supreme Court, and in light of the Supreme Court’s pivotal holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:48 pm
I hope Vergara stands, as how California goes, so goes the rest of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am
“The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is ‘materially indistinguishable’ from searches of [a wallet or purse] … That is like saying a ride on horseback is materially indistinguishable from a flight to the moon. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 5:03 pm
The first case, California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution and, thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
