Search for: "State v. Bai"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 3,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2007, 11:01 pm
Yet the text raises some concerns:1st, "military legal proceeding before a regularly-constituted court" will have to mean a court that adheres to the stringent standards contemplated by the majority in Hamdan v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:58 am
The filings were in response to an application (Zalita v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court on Monday denied review of the latest Guantanamo Bay appeal, involving two prisoners who face war crimes trials before "military commissions. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:42 pm
Yukins Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City HABEAS CORPUS SOLBOYCE F. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
"The most engaging part of the conference was its finale, a moot court re-argument of Scott v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:26 pm
Gates and Khadr v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:09 am
Circuit came in the case of Munaf, et al., v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:27 pm
Jackson has this column in today's Boston Globe on the Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
The case was Ayers v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:10 am
Bush and al Odah v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Defendant Davist appeals from his sentence for false claims against the United States, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and false statements. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:22 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Monday's orders indicated no action by the Supreme Court on two new appeals by Guantanamo Bay detainees (Boumedine v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
"Given the lengthy debates and disagreements among Members of Congress as to the handling of these detainees, and the perception that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit failed to follow this Court's direction in Rasul v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 11:39 am
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:59 am
Circuit in the case of Rasul v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
U.S., 06-639). ** Whether ERISA, the federal law on workers' benefit plans, preempts state laws that control the assignment of benefits by plan members (Louisiana Health & Indemnity v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
