Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
SOPA and PIPA The media law landscape in the United States is dominated by comment and debate on two pieces of legislation being considered in Congress, the SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act) Bills. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
BBC and Dominic Casciani v Secretary of State for Justice High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) [2012] EWHC 13 (Admin) January 11, 2012 High Court rules Justice Secretary’s refusal to grant BBC permission to have a face? [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
The application, Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Something like that happened at the oral argument last Wednesday in Coleman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
In SEC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
In SEC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
Human rights by the 1970s (on what must be accounted a revisionist view to the dominant narrative) represents a retreat to an individualistic ethic of rights against states. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:36 pm
were dominating the charts... [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The search is on for a balance between, on the one hand, according reasonable preference to those households entitled to it, and, on the other hand, giving effect to the policy but not so that policy dominates an allocation scheme. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The search is on for a balance between, on the one hand, according reasonable preference to those households entitled to it, and, on the other hand, giving effect to the policy but not so that policy dominates an allocation scheme. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
The Northern Ireland Act 1998 has therefore never really been regarded as something that can/should sustain a legally sovereign legislature, even if the Act has been described as a “constitutional statute” (see Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2002] UKHL 32). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Perhaps the best-known application of this thesis involves the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 12:56 pm
” Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:18 am
Sagarra Inversiones, S.L. v. [read post]
