Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm
The Fourth Circuit had a recent case that raised similar issues, United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 8:10 pm
Holder, 11 CIV. 889 (PAE) 2012 WL 352309 *7 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:58 am
This would not be unlike company policies in the wake of US v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313, 91 S.Ct. 1434, 28 L.Ed.2d 788 (1971), holds that, if a previous action invalidated a patent after the patent-holder had a full and fair opportunity to litigate, collateral estoppel prevents the patent-holder from enforcing the patent against an unrelated party in another action.FairWarning argued that it lacked a full and fair opportunity to present its case in the prior decision because that decision "was one of those… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313, 91 S.Ct. 1434, 28 L.Ed.2d 788 (1971), holds that, if a previous action invalidated a patent after the patent-holder had a full and fair opportunity to litigate, collateral estoppel prevents the patent-holder from enforcing the patent against an unrelated party in another action.FairWarning argued that it lacked a full and fair opportunity to present its case in the prior decision because that decision "was one of those… [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Lenz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Whether in the course of determining a complaint which has been made to an independent office holder who has been vested by statute with the functions of administering and enforcing data protection legislation that personal data is being transferred to another third country (in this case, the United States of America) the laws and practices of which, it is claimed, do not contain adequate protections for the data subject, that office… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
Here is the complaint in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:11 pm
Why are you now giving a license to bring it back into the United States? [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 2:40 pm
The high court decided long ago in Michigan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
Part V concludes with a recommendation that investment chapters be struck from the TPP and other trade agreements or that such chapters should not apply whatsoever to the protection or enforcement of IPRs given the many other enforcement powers available to patent holders. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 4:17 am
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:05 pm
In July, this author wrote about Lenz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Assignee moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Lenders Standing at Foreclosure Creadon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:53 am
May v. [read post]
