Search for: "State v. Miller" Results 3321 - 3340 of 5,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by Christa Culver
Washington, such that Miller was entitled to relief.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Kiyemba v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
  The Supreme Court found such behavior “insupportable” in Miller v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro Sasae,… [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Davis asks the now-familiar question whether Miller v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 The Secretary of State, Karen Bradley, has written to the company [pdf] indicating that she is “minded” to issue a European Intervention Notice. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:07 pm by Dan Tokaji
McDonald Book Review Voter Fraud in the United States: Real or Imagined? [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:13 am by Ray Dowd
Grunbaum's art collection surfaced in Switzerland in 1956 under disputed circumstances, and in the first Holocaust-era art recovery trial in U.S. history, Bakalar v. [read post]