Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 36,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 4:42 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
At the heart of Doe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
At the heart of Doe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 12:56 pm
Bush, who presided over 152 executions as governor of Texas, wants to halt the execution of Jose Ernesto Medellin in what has become a confusing test of presidential power that the Supreme Court ultimately will sort out. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 12:36 pm
Other states have periodically challenged Delaware, but have routinely failed. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:53 pm
Those bonus payments were inserted by powerful Senators and Ed Libby is required by law to honor the contracts, but he is the one being grilled. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:55 am
Robins and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:53 am
Adam Candeub (Michigan State) appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
It upheld the state's power to impose a nominal fine on an unvaccinated person. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
But while the Court increasingly relies on agency structures to adjudicate constitutionality, separation-of-powers scholarship has focused on the division of powers into legislative, executive, and judicial functions.This Article supplies the missing account of separation of structures, in the process defending the legitimacy of the administrative state against its critics. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:19 am
Read the full text of the Coleman v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:21 am
United States (Breach of Trust; Fort Laramie Treaty) Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:52 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
However, he stated there was a “strong public interest in this statutory regime”. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:01 am
In Worcester v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
In addition, the applicant relied on the judgment in Lord Janner v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2015] EWHC 2578 (Admin) in which the Divisional Court found that the Magistrates’ Court had no power to send a defendant for trial under section 51 CDA 1998 if they are not present in the courtroom. [read post]
