Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 15,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Today’s argument in Delia v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:03 am
United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
Flynn v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
But are you also guilty of the (much bigger) felony offense of bringing drugs into jail in violation of Penal Code sect. 4573, which states that "Except when otherwise authorized . . . any person who, knowingly brings or sends into, or knowingly assists in bringing into, or sending into, any state prison . . . or into any county . . . jail . . . any controlled substance . . . is guilty of a felony. . . . [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:53 am
The state’s attorney determined that the employee acted in self-defense and no charges were filed against him. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:49 am
Riegel v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Professor Rebecca Tsosie Part 2: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States, New Zealand, and Beyond View presentation here Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
The Act disclaims the entities' status as an agency or establishment of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 12:30 am
SiegelIn Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:29 am
In City of San Jose v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:18 pm
He advises that the ‘Convention-compatible way for the State to fulfil its positive obligations regarding media freedom is either to opt for a self-regulatory model or to adopt a co-regulatory model’. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am
Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:32 am
Case Citation: Hosseinzadeh v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
Holder that continues the slow dismantling of the United States No Fly List. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
NOTE: The petition discussed in the post below — National Rifle Association, et al, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 5:49 am
While some other stuff was going on yesterday, my friend Lindsay Harrison at Jenner & Block and I filed an amicus brief on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and in support of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:35 pm
Individuals who are unemployed will have income “imputed” to them at 150% of the state or federal minimum wage, whichever is larger. [read post]
