Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 16,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
However, the respondents relied on case law setting a higher standard in cases involving tribunals with a strong privative clause, arguing that the threshold test is whether there is a strong prima facie case. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] More in the Saga of the Escaped Cat, Here Meowing About "a Russian/Israeli Oligarch"
24 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm
In today's decision by Judge Ronnie Abrams (S.D.N.Y.) in Rollag v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 8:08 pm
State, and Hurst v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 2:40 pm
It begins by discussing the recent transformation in church-state jurisprudence through decisions like Burwell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
From Ganske v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:20 pm
Merely by way of example, the California Supreme Court in Stanson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:48 am
In Ngyuen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am
"There are strong policy reasons to encourage cease and desist letters. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:41 am
But if you do choose to pre-record yourself nodding and sipping coffee, spend your free time listening to Marlene’s summary of the recent copyright litigation of Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:51 pm
"] From Dousa v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm
Despite the strong disagreement between the majority and the dissent in this Ninth Circuit opinion, on the whole, I agree with Judge Smith.Which is easier to say than you might imagine. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:21 am
Most importantly, our review indicates that about 70% of the U.S. companies that joined the BRT statement are incorporated in Delaware, which is widely viewed as a state with strong shareholder-centric corporate law. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:44 pm
Russo and Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
In the case of Decker v. [read post]
