Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2017, 5:06 pm
Multilateral v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 5:06 pm
Multilateral v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
"[149] The law in McIntyre v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:59 am
“If you're a parent and you buy a V-Tech toy, put in a fake address. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
The proposed Copyright Modernization Act (and here the Kat quotes)* provides legal protection for businesses that choose to use technological protection measures (TPMs) or "digital locks", to protect their IP as part of their business models;* implements the rights and protections of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Internet Treaties, which brings Canada in line with international standards [up-to-date to the mid 1990s?] [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
Yes, anonymous speech is protected. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
Yes, anonymous speech is protected. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm
Does WVU really think that consumers are likely to be confused into thinking these t-shirts originate with WVU or are approved by it? [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
Both the common law privacy claims and the statutory claims were designed to protect users’ well-established privacy interests. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm
But if Chick-fil-A, a multi-million dollar fast food company, has its way, Muller-Moore won’t be able to protect his business. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your… [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:22 am
But in 2011, the Supreme Court made clear in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:22 am
But in 2011, the Supreme Court made clear in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:47 am
Surescripts and U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
The Coast Guard considered whether or not outboard motor propellers should be covered with guards to protect swimmers (and manatees) against being cut up if they were run over, but couldn't reach a definitive conclusion. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Take it away, Martinez v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:58 pm
” The Jordan standard deters harassment victims from speaking up by depriving them of their statutory entitlement to protection from retaliation, the appeals court reasoned. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (IP ThinkTank), (further discussion from IAM and e^(ip)) Illusory world of trade secret protection – Discussion of S Schreter’s article ‘Inside entrepreneurship: Patent protection isn’t only option’: (IPBiz) Global – Copyright Illegal art: (Patry Copyright Blog), Events 1-3 June: ACC Europe 2008 annual conference ‘Becoming a global legal manager: Developing the skills… [read post]
15 May 2020, 12:44 am
This was in the case of Arkin v. [read post]
