Search for: "UNITED STATES MARSHALS" Results 3321 - 3340 of 5,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm by Beth Taylor
I'm not sure what he has done in his actions against the United States government, the United States interests, the United States citizens, that would merit an article 3 trial. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:54 pm by Jeralyn
This proposal supports additional litigators for CRM’s Gang Unit, which not only prosecutes complex gang cases but also provides support to federal, state, and local prosecutors and law enforcement. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:54 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
First State Bank of Denton, 566 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex. 1978); Marshall, 878 S.W.2d at 631; Beal Bank, SSB v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States; a very slippery opinion by Chief Justice Hughes.1935-1936:  The Court invalidates many other New Deal statutes1936:  FDR is reelected overwhelmingly and the Democrats rule the roost for decades.Some generations played out a little differently. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:48 am
Another official came over and I inquired if voting in the United States Of America was by secret ballot. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:46 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
" Justice John Marshall in 1807 was the first to withdraw habeas authority from its more robust and wide-ranging common law roots to insist that “the power to award the writ by any of the courts of the United States, must be given by written law. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
As secretary of state for President Harry Truman, he pioneered the Marshall Plan. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:51 am by Jon
In the United States, courts in general do not have direct line authority over armed enforcement agents. [read post]
28 May 2010, 12:58 am by Randall Reese
Berman, United States District Judge in the Southern District of New York, entered a Consent Order for Creation of Receivership and Appointment of Receiver Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:22 pm
In the end of the opinion, one of the reasons given by John Marshall for finding constitutional objection to their appellate jurisdiction was the nature of the oath that the judges had to take, and the fact that they had to solemnly swear to administer justice and so forth, and 'according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.' And he stresses the fact that because they take that oath to uphold… [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:08 am by Allison Tussey
” “We appreciate the assistance United States Department of Justice INTERPOL Division and U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
United States Postal Service, stemming from the postal service’s efforts to invalidate a patent for a machine that scans and processes barcodes containing address information, which speeds up the handling of undeliverable mail. [read post]
6 May 2022, 12:55 pm by Josh Blackman
Abortion is exactly the kind of hot-button issue that hostile foreign adversaries might use to stoke division within the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:53 pm
Deputy Archivist of the United States Adrienne Thomas will serve as acting Archivist until a new Archivist is appointed.... [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm by Theodore J. Kobus III
Privacy and Digital Risk Class Action and Litigation: Uniting attorneys who have deep subject matter experience and have defended more than 100 class action matters. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:54 am by Neil Burns
  Apparently the United States Marshalls had to forcibly enter his house to bring him to the hearing. [read post]