Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 3321 - 3340 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
”   This matter involved the regulatory authority of the Board and the County, not any relief against individual water rights holders. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm by Venkat
He has also posted extensively on a recent Ninth Circuit decision that bears on these issues: United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
Such remedies should include judicial and non-judicial remedies compatible with the Third Pillar duties and responsibilities of States under the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Lawrence Lessig ‘on the economics’: curse of the copyright holders (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright Decisions District Court Massachusetts: Not much hope left – copyright claim time-barred, claim for unjust enrichment pre-empted: Jürek Zamoyski v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Holder and who represent the challenger in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Russ Bensing
”  In Holder v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Likewise, the only one of President Nixon's appointees to recuse in United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
NOTORIOUS INFRINGERS (Section 107) SOPA also provides that the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator ("IPEC") shall "conduct an analysis of notorious foreign infringers whose activities cause significant harm to holders of intellectual property rights in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
Though different in their details, these cases elucidate this issue from different perspectives:In January 2024, Rolex was successful in a US trade mark infringement case against BeckerTime before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am by Florian Mueller
In late July the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a "final" (but not final-final) Office action rejecting all claims of the '915 patent. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am by ksmcarlson
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]