Search for: "United States v. Was"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 102,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 5:45 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, is on SSRN: This brief—filed by five law professors as amici curiae in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 2:44 am
United States</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:38 am
Cue Bush v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
Circuit, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Case date: 05 December 2023 Case number: No. 22-1006 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:08 am
From Linthicum v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”As for the purported travel restrictions, the AD1 agreed that it was up to the State Department (not the courts) to remove any restrictions on his passport, so that the father could return to the United States.Apparently, his arguments didn’t travel well, either.# # #DECISIONVelin M. v Bermet T. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm
Precedent from the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
The latest volume of the Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Vol. 26, 2022) is out. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
United States</em>? [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:06 am
Life Insurance Attorneys need to know this 2023 case from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
