Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 3321 - 3340 of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Anthony B. Cavender
 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
• Standing water approximately 3 inches deep was observed at the southeast corner of the manure pit located inside Layer 1 – House 13. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm by Mark Walsh
  Or a manufacturer of cars, you can sell cars in the United States, but every third car you have to give to the United States? [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
Member States confirmed their strong opposition to reprisals against persons cooperating with the United Nations and its human rights mechanism and representatives. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am by Dale Carpenter
[What the Supreme Court should do in 303 Creative v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am by Expert Witness Guru
ISP Technologies, Inc., 259 F.3d 924, 929 (8th Cir. 2001) (emphasis added), but “[t]here is less need for the gatekeeper to keep the gate when the gatekeeper is keeping the gate only for himself,” United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
The Court directed the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action in Jilek v Stockson, Solomon v Blue Water Village East LLC, and LaMeau v City of Royal Oak. [read post]