Search for: "Williams v Williams"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 17,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:24 pm
Discrimination/RetaliationWilliams v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:29 am
William Gagne, Jr. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
(Superior Court of Stanislaus County, No. 624500, William A. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
California (1941) – Clare PastoreRemaking the “Law of the Poor”: Williams v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:00 am
William Hines published a study of close to 500 nation-wide punitive damages awards between 2004 and 2011. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:50 am
Only weeks after its opinion in Williams v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Hedman and a number of others initiated an Article 78 action in an effort to have the court remove Town of Howard Board Member William O. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
Williams. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:19 am
A Sixth Circuit panel unanimously held last week in Williams v. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Writing for the Seventh Circuit in ACF 2006 Corp v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:41 pm
William Baude, who is a fellow at Stanford Law School, has posted Beyond DOMA: Choice of State Law in Federal Statutes on SSRN. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:55 am
Keyword suggestion, however, was a “neutral tool” that did nothing more than provide options that advertisers could adopt or reject, in the court's view.The opinion in Jurin v. [read post]
