Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 3341 - 3360 of 9,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
To buy tickets to the Pioneer Awards: https://www.eff.org/Pioneer2016 Contact:  RebeccaJeschkeMedia Relations Director and Digital Rights Analystpress@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 Too bad Google wasn’t buying, that sale would have sailed right through the Justice Department [sic]. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
Pauley, the challenge by a Missouri church to its exclusion from a state program that provides grants to help non-profits buy rubber playground surfaces. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:11 am by Amy Howe
  The church argues that its exclusion from a state program that provides grants to help non-profits buy rubber playground surfaces violates the Constitution, because it discriminates against religious institutions. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
Last week, in IE Test, LLC v Carroll, 2016 WL 4086260 [NJ Sup Ct Aug. 2, 2016], that state’s Supreme Court handed down a major decision in which it reversed the lower courts’ summary judgment order expelling an LLC member and adopted a series of factors to assist trial courts in determining whether it is not reasonably practicable to operate an LLC in light of a subject member’s conduct. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Law creates idea that the market is separate from the state. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:58 am by Jack Kennedy
On 16 December 2015, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Société Coopérative de Production SeaFrance SA v The Competition and Markets Authority. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]