Search for: "C. M. v. State" Results 3341 - 3360 of 6,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 6:09 pm by Nate Russell
In Queen Victoria’s early reign, the courts grappled with the “public inconvenience”—as one judge mildly put it [Mortimer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
”  I’m sorry, but I thought that the answer to any question involving ACCA was “unconstitutionally vague,” including “what does ACCA taste like? [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm by Lucy Reed
The judge states that “What is concerning about this case is that the continued litigation is proving to cause stress, anxiety, upset and confusion to B. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
It has now been confirmed that two companies in the United States have potentially been the subject of cyber-terrorism. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The case was brought by Pom Wonderful, the largest maker in the United States of 100% pomegranate juice and the owner of the 'POM' trade mark, which filed suit for infringement and requested that the defendant to be preliminarily enjoined from selling a pomegranate-flavoured energy drink labelled "pŏm".* Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financingIf your resolution for the New Year is to learn something more about biotech… [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [1] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a pathogen has… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, [2014] EUECJ C-98/13 (06 February 2014), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that a pirated good is distributed in a member State when it is purchased online from a non-member State and shipped from another non-member State into a member State. [read post]