Search for: "Case v. People" Results 3341 - 3360 of 51,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2022, 4:15 pm
There's a right to actually see the trial, unless it's a special case. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The case of Beaman v ARTS Ltd [1949] 1 KB 550 explored the question of whether fraud was a necessary allegation in order to constitute a cause of action under the LA 1939, s 26, holding that fraudulent concealment “may acquire its character as such from the very manner in which that act is performed”. [read post]
The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it has granted certiorari in the case City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
’” Even where not done so directly, the Court has repeatedly repudiated the underpinnings of the theory in cases like Smiley v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The second is about the distinction between holding and dicta, specifically as applied to the case of California v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 11:56 am
In some cases, this can have very important practical implications on the rights of the people involved.In Air Canada v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 7:59 am
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:57 pm
Several people sought redress from AT&T, which advertised that subscribers got a free phone, but in fact charged sales tax on the value of the phones. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 4:54 pm by Matthew Nelson
The Court granted leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
In summary, they raised the following points:Diminished capacity was first recognized as a defense in 1973 by People v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 11:42 am by Madelaine Lane
  The Court also remanded People v. [read post]