Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 28,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 8:50 am
Coleman v Attridge Law and another (Case C-303/06); [2008] WLR (D) 257 “The person whose disability gave rise to direct discrimination against an employee, so as to constitute an infringement of Directive 2000/78 on equal treatment and occupation, could in principle be a disabled child of the employee, and was not limited to the employee himself, and the same was true of harassment of the employee. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:07 am
Jury understands ’significant’ Regina v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:34 am
In McKelvey v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:10 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:18 am
In SMO (A Child) v Tiktok Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Gallina v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
" The case, Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Diehl v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Diehl v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
One answer can be found in a recent case, Walker v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:24 am
Jones v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:09 am
Garcia v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T Court of Appeal “A child supervision order had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:35 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council House of Lords “A local authority's children's services unit could not purport to fulfil its duties to look after a homeless child merely by referring him to the homeless persons unit. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 26; [2009] WLR (D) 159 “When a child aged 16 or 17 who had been excluded from his family home applied to the children's service department of the local authority for accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989, and he satisfied all the requirements of [...] [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:04 am
Regina (M) v East Sussex County Council Queen’s Bench Division “The failure by a local authority to amend a child's statement of special educational needs during the year of his transfer between phases of schooling, and to name and specify the type of school was a breach of its statutory obligation. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:01 am
R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:10 pm
New York v. [read post]
