Search for: "Cross v. Cross"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 21,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
In this case, the inmate overcomes that hurdle.The case is Alvarez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 10:59 pm
In Kurwa v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:13 pm
The Library of Parliament today published a post on its HillNotes blog that refers to the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:41 am
Here's a civil rights case with the least sympathetic plaintiffs as possible, which is why they were awarded one dollar in damages, which the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Warren v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 2:18 pm
Judge Koetl ruled that "this argument is squarely foreclosed by the Supreme Court's holding in Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:20 am
" Stuart Spector Designs Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:07 am
In a 9-0 decision released today, in Ohio v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 3:21 am
The trial of the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC continued yesterday before Mr Justice Mann at the Rolls Building in London. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court of Canada will release its decision in The Queen v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:50 pm
In Health First, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
The Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am
Mesa, a case that stems from the cross-border shooting of a Mexican teenager by a U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:23 am
Figeroa v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Missouri v McNeely, United States Supreme Court (4/17/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawMcNeely, stopped for speeding and crossing the centerline, declined to take a breath test to measure his blood alcohol concentration (BAC). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm
The following post, cross-posted on Opinio Juris, continues to analyze the import of the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:05 pm
In Kadic v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:17 am
Plaintiff did not submit the summary until nearly a month after the original oral argument on defendant’s cross motion (see Kopeloff v Arctic Cat, Inc., 84 AD3d 890, 890-891 [2d Dept 2011]). [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:07 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
