Search for: "Doe VI " Results 3341 - 3360 of 5,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am by Devlin Hartline
Whether the opinion reaches a result that corresponds to one’s particular normative views does not concern me. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Running into your room and locking your door – in essence what the House of Representatives did on the 2014 budget and continues to do on comprehensive immigration reform – does not produce effective solutions to complex problems. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 7:49 am by Wells Bennett
 When asked, Massucco tells Ruiz that he does not order any searches; his role, instead, is reactive. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Because the Constitution does not grant the President legislative authority, the President cannot validly issue an executive order, unless Congress has delegated that authority to the President, he explained. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:17 am by Ritika Singh
Michael Kugelman of the Woodrow Wilson Center has an op-ed in the Times arguing that President Obama should push to strengthen the country’s civilian leadership vis-a-vis its all-powerful military. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Count 8 charges Criminal Contempt in the First Degree under Penal Law § 215.51(b)(vi). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Bruce Khula
Driver began by arguing that the purpose of the political restructuring doctrine vis-a-vis the 14th Amendment was to “protect minority rights against a white majority” — drawing immediate skepticism from Justice Scalia, who responded that the Supreme Court had “held that the 14th Amendment protects all races. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:02 pm by Steven Buchwald
But with that additional retailer dimension comes additional responsibilities vis-à-vis consumers in the form of disclosures requirements. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Penal Law § 130.35(3) does not require proof of force but merely that the victim be less than eleven years old. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 3:28 pm
The court does not credit the mother's testimony that she has never spoken to her children regarding the father's actions. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nonetheless, the Court does find that the first child’s statements are sufficiently corroborated to support a finding of sexual abuse by the respondent. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:57 am by John L. Welch
Although it would be proper to consider the legislative context vis-a-vis the Paris Convention and the Lanham Act, it would not be proper to consider the "legislative history" - e.g., the statements of legislators regarding the statute.The court concluded that, even assuming the Lanham Act was intended to implement the obligations of the Paris Convention, there was nothing in either the text of the context thereof to suggest any support for the District's position.Article… [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:45 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Family Court Act § 1046(a)(vi) states that "previous statements made by the child relating to any allegations of abuse or neglect shall be admissible in evidence. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As such, the Court does find that respondent is a person legally responsible for the care of the first child. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 3:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The fact that he was convicted, by the same court, upon his plea of guilt of the crime of fornication based upon a single incident, involving the same woman is claimed to obliterate the effect of the convictions of the rape, and the assault with intent to commit it, as felonies, it being contended that the crimes of fornication vis-a-vis the crimes of rape and assault with intent to commit rape are mutually exclusive. [read post]