Search for: "Doe v. Delaware"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 3,878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
Pubco is the most important statement from Delaware on fiduciary review in short form mergers since Glassman (decided by the Delaware Supreme Court in 2001) -- it’s interesting that eight years have gone by without a meaningful revisiting by Delaware’s highest court of the open issues therein, but that’s for another day. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 8:35 am
The roots of Delaware's projections problem go back to the mid-1980s, and specifically to a case called Weinberger v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:19 am
See, e.g., Ryan v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
Moreover, as the litigation in City of Westland v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:16 pm
And, if so, does Emerald Partners have any teeth on that score? [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:56 am
Mickman v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 3:01 pm
Kurt discussed the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision in Gantler v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:03 am
The court explained as follows: “Delaware law does not hold directors liable for failing to carry out a perfect process in a sale of control. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 2:05 pm
Latesco, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:18 am
Certainly winning this single-game bet involves more skill than does a parley bet. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:59 am
Culley v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
We are discussing CITY OF WESTLAND POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
Delaware & Hudson Ry. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
In Berger v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
The Company does, however, have a majority vote provision. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Stockman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
That's what Delaware's judiciary does better than any other in the world. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:18 pm
Berger v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:47 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:59 am
In Berger v. [read post]
