Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 9,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 5:30 am
If your estate is valued at less than $1 million, not one penny of federal estate taxes will be due. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:29 pm
What does the legislation provide? [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:58 am
Judge Linn pointed out that, in an IPR, the burden of persuasion is on the petitioner to prove “unpatentability by a preponderance of the evidence,” citing 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 8:40 pm
Even on that assumption, it still does not respond to the question posed under Rule 7-1(4), and that is whether the existence of a policy of insurance is relevant to the costs issue, and, if it is, whether there is a policy of insurance available to the defendant in this case. [34] How a lawyer’s duties are supervised by the Law Society – to both an insurer who retains the lawyer and the insured on whose behalf the lawyer acts… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
As a result, the phrase “person acting in an official capacity” had to mean the same in s 134 as it does in article 1 of UNCAT: [23]. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:32 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:41 am
(2) Did the Federal Circuit err in refusing to order the USPTO to terminate the subject inter partes reexaminations under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:06 am
The DOL confirmed that the announcement referred to FLSA2015-1 and FLSA2016-1, which already have been removed from its website, but declined to say whether the rescission will affect related documents such as DOL fact sheets, which were still live. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:48 am
Cir. 2003) ("Title 35 does not require that a patent disclosure enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use a perfected, commercially viable embodiment absent a claim limitation to that effect. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:16 pm
Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35, a determination for a proceeding to be heard en banc “is not favored and ordinarily will not be ordered unless: (1) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions; or (2) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 2:48 pm
With six more states added to the outbreak, the total involved now stands at 35. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
Footnotes [1] Buffett, Warren E. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:11 am
No. 98-857, pt. 1, at 44 (1984)). [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
Footnotes [1] Buffett, Warren E. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:39 pm
Applies the plain language of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Figure 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:53 pm
The claim reads as follows: 1. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
The second part of the action, the actio pauliana, does not fit within in rem jurisdiction either. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
Although this observation is correct in itself, it does not lead to the conclusion that the disclaimer necessarily fails for this reason to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
