Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 4,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
" Similarly, Rule 14(1) and 14(3) also deal with the acts which an agent can undertake. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:53 am
This report was last updated on September 1, 2011 By J. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:52 am
" Summary Judgment Opinion, ECF No. 43 at 6-7. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:47 am
What does this all mean to us, simple mortals who don't have billions to spare? [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
“The States cannot separately make effectual provision for” author’s rights, wrote Madison in the Federalist 43 about why the Copyright Clause was needed. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 as granted does not include this option. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 10:30 am
This does not give the full picture. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
This, however, does not amount to a technical teaching, it is only a discovery of a biological mechanism that is not patentable under art. 52(2)(a) EPC (para. 44). [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
A District Court in Kentucky held that the court does not delve into the merits of the claim in order to identify a primary defendant; instead, it identifies by looking exclusively to the face of the complaint. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
Plaintiffs sued DOE for alleged defamatory material in a blog located at www.rkassociatesusa.blogspot.com and for false advertising under the Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).1 Plaintiffs have subpoenaed Google for its records relating to DOE in aneffort to learn his true identity. [read blog]
23 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
Plaintiffs sued DOE for alleged defamatory material in a blog located at www.rkassociatesusa.blogspot.com and for false advertising under the Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).1 Plaintiffs have subpoenaed Google for its records relating to DOE in aneffort to learn his true identity. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:58 pm
[1] Michael T. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:58 pm
[1] Michael T. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
Food & Grocery Bureau, 43 F. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
What does that mean? [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
"In 2006, after Bacardi began its sales of the Puerto Rican Havana Club rum, Pernod filed a false advertising suit under Section 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act (codified as section 1125(a)(1)(B)) - the false designation of goods provision. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
(picture, right - Pernod's Havana Club logo) Under these circumstances a district court can properly disregard survey evidence as immaterial because Section 43(a)(1) does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:02 am
Barry Harris has been described as a "hardcore bebopper" who "is great at what he does. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Court of Appeals in Philadelphia has ruled.Pernod Ricard USA filed a false advertising suit under Section 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act, asserting that the labeling of Bacardi’s bottle, particularly the use of the words “Havana Club,” misleads consumers to believe that the rum is produced in Cuba. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
§ 4005(1) (2010), alleging a course of conduct by Doe that, if proved, could allow a court to grant Blackhouse a protection from abuse order. [read post]
