Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 3341 - 3360 of 3,414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2007, 12:00 pm
(2) How should those elements of a claim that relate to excluded subject matter be treated when assessing whether an invention is novel and inventive under Articles 54 and 56? [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:36 am
Things of interest to jury watchers and thinkers over the last couple of weeks: 1. [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:00 am
….An earlier study by Rosenblatt and Hurst examined 54 obstetric malpractice claims for negligence. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
Rutherford, 442 U.S. 544, 553-54 (1979) (another FDA case).We're not going to repeat what we've already posted about the extent to which the consistency of an agency position does - and does not - impact the amount of deference owed to the administrative interpretation by the courts. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The arrest record is not complete, it does not reflect guilt, nor that the person actually committed the offense. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Because we're opposed to it, we thought we'd let everyone in on the secret, even if it does involve a lot of boring legal stuff that only hard-core lawyers could love. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:32 am
   For example, go to the SCC site and look at R v Henry 2005 SCC 76, paras 54 and 55. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:32 am
   For example, go to the SCC site and look at R v Henry 2005 SCC 76, paras 54 and 55. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 7:13 am
(For a longer description of options, see the recent report on this topic from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.)1. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
A Women's Legal Defense Fund representative commented, "A woman who does less than everything for her child is seen as a terrible mother; a man who does more than nothing is praised as a wonderful father. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 1:00 am
The House budget does not contain new prison funding, so this contentious issue must be decided in conference committee. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Law Judge George Carson II issued his decision April 7, 2003. *** Cheney Construction, Inc. (17-CA-22517; 349 NLRB No. 54) Manhattan, KS March 22, 2007. [read post]