Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 11,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 7:28 pm
The seminal Florida case defining the dangerous instrumentality doctrine is Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
(In fact, they contend, it traces back even further in English common law, to the 1500s at least.) [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 2:41 am
Additional Resources: Suarez v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 10:57 am
On Monday, the Court decided Taniguchi v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 12:33 pm
Recently, the Ontario Divisional Court released their decision in Gilbert’s LLP v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:23 am
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
” Green v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
” Green v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 12:46 am
Just like my previous post (on a newly-discovered IP Bridge v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981), and it didn't matter that the English warnings were OK.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/07/15/12-30074.pdfUnited States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
On 21 December 2017, the last day of the English High Court term, Arnold J issued a short judgment in the case of Union Des Associations Européennes de Football (better known as UEFA) v BT and Os [2017] EWHC 3414 (Ch), available on Bailii here. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:18 am
Hugenholz has written a great article on the subject in 1998 (Recept, gerecht en auteursrecht, in English 'Recipe, dish and copyright'). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 am
In Travelers Insurance Company v Countrywide Surveyors Ltd [2010] EWHC 2455 (TCC), the High Court held that it had no jurisdiction to order pre-action disclosure where the potential dispute between the parties was subject to an arbitration agreement.Countrywide Surveyors Ltd (Countrywide) obtained a professional indemnity policy on which Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) was the lead underwriter. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:28 am
In European Group Limited and Others v Chartis [2012] EWHC 1245 (QB), Mr Justice Popplewell held that damage to the insured's property during transportation was proximately caused by an external fortuitous accident or casualty, and therefore there was no room for "inherent vice" to be an additional proximate cause.The case concerned which insurers were liable for losses caused by fatigue stress cracking to tubes in economiser blocks which had been installed in a new waste… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:03 am
Tesco Stores Ltd v Constable & others [2008] EWCA Civ 362 concerned an appeal against an order of Mr Justice Field under which Field J determined that, on a proper construction of a public liability section of a standard project insurance package, Tesco was not entitled to an indemnity in respect of sums that it was liable to pay under the terms of a deed of covenant for economic loss to a third party affected by its activities.Tesco embarked on a construction of a Tesco superstore… [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Box v. [read post]
