Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 15,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Session 3: Shaping an Overall Approach to ProtectionIntroductions: Jerry Reichman and Estelle Derclaye In what ways should different forms of protection be tailored to various types of subject matter (construed legally as forms of intellectual property, but also subject matter construed socially or commercially)? [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
We could also study design as a social process, institutional practice—trying to figure out the mechanisms in society that produce design: economic, political, domestic institutions. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:25 am
Yesterday, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) issued its decision in Case C-432/18, Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH [here]. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
Borel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:57 am
The figures of the patent also did not disclose how the linked round was loaded in the Link-Tail, and the claims could have equally applied to horizontal or vertical loading. 2. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:46 am
" Pure & Simple Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:59 pm
Barn Hill Pres. of Del., LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
This assertion was made in the cases of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Indeed, as one can also read in the EUIPO Guidelines (here, at §3.4.4.4.), “[w]hen two marks consist of or contain figurative elements and/or shapes and they represent the same or similar objects or ideas, the signs will be conceptually identical or similar. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
| Shifting the burden of proof back to the patentee (T 1299/15) | JMLS IP Conference (Report 2): Patent eligibility, anti-anti suits and the era of unpredictability | UCL IBIL Event: Boris v Corbyn v Trump - putting a price on patents, medicine and innovation | CJEU follows up on Soulier and Doke and rules that presumption of consent of performers in relation to exploitation of recordings is not necessarily contrary to EU law | GC excludes likelihood of confusion between marks… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
” (SABAM v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Floresand Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
However, the recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek in case C-702/18, Primart Marek Łukasiewicz v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:52 pm
Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Moss (2019) EWHC 3261 (Ch) Ever since Jones v London Borough of Southwark (2016) EWHC 457 (Ch) (our report), the position on water rates taken as rent by a number of London Councils and Housing Associations under agreements with Thames Water has been conflicted. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
" Ward v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
Milkovich v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 6:01 am
These goals are rarely achieved with a three-V approach to dispute resolution. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
