Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 3341 - 3360 of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
”Additionally, given that a win in the contract breach lawsuit would “moot” the fraudulent conveyance dispute, and because joining the two matters together would delay the trial of the first action, the AD1 thought that consolidation should have been denied and the discovery in the later dispute should have been stayed, and reversed the underlying determination accordingly.The AD1 sure took action there ….# # #DECISION3B v… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
Given that conflicting testimony, the AD2 agreed that it was premature to grant summary relief to the defendants, and affirmed the denial of their request to be released from the case,We’re going to bite our tongue, now ….# # #DECISIONQ. v S. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
Given these and other considerations – including that the foster parent was a “consistent source of support and love for the child” and was “fully engaged in the child's schooling, medical care, and emotional and intellectual development and committed to fostering an ongoing relationship between the child and his extended family” – the AD1 left the outcome undisturbed.There was no fostering a different result there.# # #DECISIONMatter of… [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
Finally, given programmers’ investment in learning the Sun Java API, to allow enforcement of Oracle’s copyright here would risk harm to the public. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:14 am by Ted Frank
The Wall Street Journal reports that Jay Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis, who successfully argued that federal law requires preemption of state failure-to-warn claims for generic drugs, given the lack of discretion that such generics have, in Pliva v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:45 pm
Therefore, any deficiencies in the chain of custody went only to the weight to be given to the evidence, not its admissibility as was also held in People v Hawkins. [read post]