Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 19,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 6:36 am
I refer to a classic contract law case, Odorizzi v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
From yesterday's decision in Human Rights Defense Center v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Myraid Genetics, which is scheduled for oral arguments on April 15 and in which the Court will consider whether human genes are patentable; (2) Bowman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:35 pm
Whipple J considered section 12(2) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (‘HRA’) and was satisfied that all reasonable steps had been taken to notify the respondent of the hearing. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 7:34 am
Civil society organizations in Argentina, such as Observatorio de Derecho Informático Argentino, Fundación Vía Libre, and Access Now, have gone to courts to enforce their right to access information about the new unit created. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
“Aspirations”: The United States and Indigenous Peoples’ human rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 10:23 am
Take the recent case of Maree v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
See Minister of Health & Ors v Treatment Action Campaign & Others (No. 2). [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:52 am
Judge Shira Scheindlin's decisions in Zubulake v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
” In Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
It also enables the United States to be a more forceful voice for human rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
With humans. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In the Gambia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:59 pm
It is therefore rather fortuitous that the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), in the recent case of Lopez Ribalda v Spain [2019] ECHR 752, has handed down an important judgment in relation to the surveillance of employees in the workplace, and their right to privacy pursuant to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights that, in my view, complements the Court’s earlier decision in Bărbulescu v Romania [2016] App. no.… [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:55 am
Among them were:Becerra v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dobbs v. [read post]
