Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 14,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2007, 8:26 pm
Bottom line, they're right, but so what? [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 9:33 am
In San Antonio, you may also be familiar with a local brand of these zippy scooters called Blue Duck Scooters. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:35 am
If any matches occur, figure out what type of brand or products it protects, as you still might be able to use your name if it is a different enough industry or product. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:34 am
Consult a Lawyer If you’re certain that you took the product correctly, consider consulting a lawyer. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:47 am
They like to think the big brands are taking it easy, and they start hijacking your brand keywords. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
Weak or strong, the question is whether it’s clear you’re being offered an alternative. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:39 am
They think they're being smart when they are being very dumb. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
It also intrigues me from a branding law perspective, especially because it involves defending the alleged “re-branding” of something that does not seem to ever have been a brand. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 5:34 am
Whether you’re an individual artist, a tech startup, or a multinational corporation, your intellectual assets—whether they be a unique product design, a catchy brand name, or a groundbreaking invention—are valuable assets that require robust legal protection. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:22 am
My friend Mike Kim‘s book You Are The Brand has some valuable insights about marketing as an entrepreneur, such as this: “When you decide that you’re going to build a business around yourself—a personal brand business—something shifts. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:56 am
When you own the rights, you won’t have to worry about an established brand sending a cease and desist if they think you’re copying them. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:52 pm
We're protecting the brand, not the consumer. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 2:45 pm
Later, I began to focus on what we're celebrating, our independence from the British Crown, the birth of our nation, a reason for all of us to be proud. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:48 pm
I hope everyone had a wonderful holiday—we’re back from the brief break and here for another Top 10. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:16 pm
Apologies for this coming out a little late today, but we’re here nonetheless. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:10 am
Judge Meter authored the majority opinion in In re TD, No. 294716, and Judge Krause concurred to urge the Legislature to consider giving trial courts the ability to exercise discretion to deregister people who can be shown to be non-dangerous. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 10:07 pm
So maybe the list indicates a type of brand power. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
In re Kellogg North America Co., Serial No. 76610903 (February 22, 2007) [not precedential].The Board applied its standard Section 2(e)(4) analysis in finding that Examining Attorney Anne Farrell established a prima facie case that Applicant Kellogg failed to rebut. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:01 am
Although the schools might sometimes be referred to by the single term "Kamehameha" in certain contexts, does that mean consumers will likely be confused when they see the brand name KAMEHAMEHA on clothing? [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:43 am
I’m re-cycling a picture from April because there’s another lawyer recycling a money-making strategy that’s been in use for quite a while. [read post]
