Search for: "In re: Roger"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 3,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2007, 12:19 am
Rogers' story, as a factual matter, seemed relatively credible, both because of his history of accurate outings and because there is no discernible reason why, if he were intent on fabricating, he would single out someone as obscure as Larry Craig, who was not even up for re-election....Among right-wing pundits -- weeks before the election -- there was nothing but support for Craig and outrage over the reporting of this story. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 11:15 pm
Purpura also resisted the temptation to dedicate enormous resources to re-sign fading superstars Andy Pettitte and Roger Clemens, so the club's payroll is positioned for a new GM to bid for a couple of free agent pitchers this winter to shore up the pitching staff. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
(Incumbent)Lesperance, Lisa V.And, finally, the two sitting judges who have yet to file for re-election are:016 Figarola, Rosa C.030 Miranda, CristinaMany questions will be answered in the next few months:Will Judge Ivan Fernandez decide not to run for re-election simply because one or two of the readers of this blog continue to confuse him with Ivan Hernandez? [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
"I guess I would just ask that you stay tuned with regard to these and know that we're thinking about them. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:11 am
Here are some passages from Rogers v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:52 pm
We're talking about the game on Sept. 16, 2007 at 1 p.m. at the Rogers Center in Toronto. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:45 pm
" Ok, you're a Congressman or Senator, you have basically one job, pass laws. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
See the unsealed Appeals Court ruling “In Re: Sealed Case,” June 29, 2007. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
") The judicial statements of what was sought by the prosecutors is illustrative of my point that as a realistic matter one cannot really separate reasons and acts into those that are protected and those that are not protected, because they're all mixed up together and in truth are one and the same: the evidence sought here is both the protected reason for a protected legislative act and the unprotected reason for an unprotected bribe. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 12:00 am
Melissa Rogers has a long posting about the exchange on her blog, and BNA's Daily Report for Executives [subscription required] covered the discussion last Friday.Here is Egger's provocative challenge:If most people have a choice between feeding a poor kid and fighting the reason the kids are poor, they're going to opt, right now, historically, for the organization that feeds the kid. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
(Good luck if you're not a billionaire with the money to bribe half the Congress? [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 12:02 pm
.; Roger M. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 2:20 am
They've all been briefed and agreed before the meeting what they're going to do. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 7:30 pm
We're less sure about what it means to say we trust someone and even more perplexed by what it takes to engender trust," writes Jay Gordon Cone of Interaction Associates. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 6:32 pm
We're scared the GOP will say mean things about us. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:13 pm
" "Murdoch, you're a scoundrel but you've got yourself a deal. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 2:42 pm
As settlement agreement details get ironed out, Cardinal Roger M. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:24 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Robert Rogers v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 7:07 am
At Concurring Opinions, Dave Hoffman has posted an update of the law blog ranking project initiated by Roger Alford at Opinio Juris. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
Rogers [read post]
