Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10." Results 3341 - 3360 of 3,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
Text presents its own constellations of difficult questions, questions the resolution of which colors not just the analysis/explanation but also exposes the fundamental premises from which commentary is approached. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
If a corporate dissolution contest could be re-imagined as a TV game show, I'd call the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 10:42 pm
Were they so young when making an initial statement that they really didn't remember? [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In re Lehman Brothers Securities & ERISA Litigation, 655 F. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
While acknowledging that “unwritten unconstitutional principles can be used as an aid to resolve genuinely open questions of constitutional and statutory interpretation”, Miller J.A. states they cannot be used “to inject a proviso into s. 92(8) of the Constitution Act, 1867 to prevent the legislature from enacting legislation altering the ward structure during an election must be rejected”. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:37 pm by Sanjana
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) project, for example, once fully online will redefine Big Data not just for the scientific community, but possibly go on to re-engineer supercomputing and data transmission technologies as we know them today, given that data transport from the radio dishes will produce ten times the current global internet traffic[10]. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
They’re not going to give it to you if you’re going off and your phone doesn’t wanna work. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See Town Versus Gown Fight Continues Over State University EIR. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
  “The holding and distribution of funds by the [Collective] … shall supersede and preempt any State law … concerning escheatment or abandoned property. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Texas, that asks the question: Do states have to comply with the Takings Clause? [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
A copy of that brief is here.The FDA's Biffle brief concerned the propriety of state-law discovery rather than a state-law cause of action, but be that as it may, the point we're making is the same. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:31 am
 The Decision states it is to be published, but Merpel has not yet seen an official publication of it by the EPO. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The question is whether new meaning/message may reasonably be perceived and the answer is yes. [read post]