Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3341 - 3360 of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 10:01 pm by Tom
To identify its meaning, one must consult almost two decades worth of Federal Reports, searching for cases describing or enforcing the judicially-created crime of honest-services fraud, before this Court rejected them all as exceeding the judicial function in McNally v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:22 pm
A defendant who didn’t make that request clearly enough was unsuccessful in his appeal in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am by Joost Pauwelyn
  Streamlining Tuna with Cloves, in both cases we now have:  (1) a finding of discrimination (cloves v. menthols in Cloves; stricter labeling requirements in the ETP v. outside the ETP in Tuna) and  (2) a finding that the ban on cloves / strict labeling requirements in the ETP are not more trade restrictive than necessary. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am by SHG
Wade (or, to be more pedantic, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
 It would seem “quite wrong” for this court to interpret Article 6 of the Convention as laying down an absolute exclusionary rule of evidence that goes any wider than Strasbourg has already clearly decided to be the case: this was the application of the “Ullah principle” -  Lord Bingham’s well known aphorism in (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 at para 20. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Frito-Lay, Inc., ARB No. 10-132, ALJ No. 2010-OFC-2 (ARB May 8, 2012) Final Administrative Order PDF | HTM [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Frito-Lay, Inc., ARB No. 10-132, ALJ No. 2010-OFC-2 (ARB May 8, 2012) Final Administrative Order PDF | HTM [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:22 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Otherwise, they'd essentially just be leaving some units unguarded, or more likely "guarded" by "building tenders" (inmate enforcers), like back in the bad old days, pre-William Wayne Justice and Ruiz v. [read post]