Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm
(para 71) Nevertheless he felt constrained by the present state of the law to decide against Prudential. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
In R (L) v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
One of those cases, Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
His Lordship applied the principle established in Freeport v Arnoldson [2007] E.C.R. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions The Tasmanian case of Burch v Parkinson ([2010] TASSC 42) concerned third party indemnity proceedings against the State of Tasmania. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:55 pm
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ([2010], Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, said: In reality very few citizens can scrutinise the judicial process: that scrutiny is performed by the media, whether newspapers or television, acting on behalf of the body of citizens. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm
Lord Justice May stated: “When Costings Limited conducted the costs assessment hearing, their rights of audience rested on a fiction that they were employed by the solicitors and derived from section 27(2)(e) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Moses and Mumby LJJ) in Imerman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:59 am
R (Limbuela) v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
Frances had been attending Steve Ballmer's lecture on cloud computing at LSE, at which Lord Justice Jacob asked Steve what he thought of software patents. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
The farmer lent a churn to the neighbour who returned it in a damaged state. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:15 am
The House of Lords ruled in 2005 in the case of A & Ors v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in McKennitt v Ash was followed shortly afterwards in the Court of Appeal decision in Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers [2008] QB 103. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:54 am
The Court of Appeal held in UE (Nigeria) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department that in deciding whether the removal of a person from the UK is compatible with their human rights, their value to the community can and in many cases should be taken into account. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:19 am
In a recent example, the House of Lords may have instituted a positive obligation on the state to provide housing to asylum seekers. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
” [39] Lord Judge CJ then proceeded to discuss a number of Strasbourg authorities including in particular Atkinson, Crook and The Independent v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm
I refer to the treatment of that decision by Lord Oliver of Aylmerton in A.G. v Guardian [1987] 1 WLR 1248 at 1319 D-E, referred to by Bingham LJ in the Court of Appeal in A.G. v Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 217C. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:19 am
Lord Steyn identified four general propositions arising from the case law: First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Lord Phillips MR, giving the judgment of the Court stated:- “We wish, however, to make some brief observations about [Lord Woolf CJ’s guidance in A v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm
J M v. [read post]
