Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 5,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2013, 7:33 am
Prior post on this matter here. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:33 am
Prior post on this matter here. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm
AUTHOR: Harry J. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Estate of Fred Short, d/b/a Sime Construction Co.[7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm
August 20, 2013 Earlier today the Competition Bureau announced the fairly long-awaited decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (per Marrocco J.) in the Rogers Chatr misleading advertising and performance claims case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Board had already explained in its decisions J 7/96 [2.2] and J 8/96 [2.2], these provisions form part of a system of legal process which is provided under the EPC for determining the right to a European patent application when this is in dispute, and for implementing this determination. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:15 am
” Who knew J & J were such pushovers? [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Robinson-Patman Act sections 2(a) and (b). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:45 am
Robinson-Patman Act sections 2(a) and (b). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
A case that comes to mind is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Nov. 15, 1993, 846 F.Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (Mukasey, J.). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:35 am
Justice Philip J. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
b. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:08 pm
” Slip Op. at 7, quoting FRCP 26(a)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:34 am
“It is philosophers who have the task of exploring what matters to us most—what is freedom? [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Judge Richard J. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Allegheny April 24, 2013 Wettick, J.). [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Allegheny April 24, 2013 Wettick, J.). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:26 pm
For present sanctions purposes it is significant that Fluker held that failure by a civil court to exercise subject matter jurisdiction to resolve a church property dispute "simply because the litigants are religious organizations, may deny a local church recourse to an impartial body to resolve a just claim, thereby violating its members' rights under the free exercise provision, and also constitute a judicial establishment of the hierarchy's religion". [read post]
