Search for: "MATTER OF M J S"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 4,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
‘(2) MODIFICATION TO REFLECT REDUCED APPLICABLE CREDIT AMOUNTS- The amount determined under section 2505(a)(1) for each calendar year shall not exceed the estate’s applicable credit amount under section 2010(c). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
He's someone who matters. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:01 am
Today, OFAC has added [SDNTK] Entries to the Specially Designated Nationals List (SDN List): The following [SDNTK] entries have been added to OFAC’s SDN list: AGROPECUARIA LA PERLA LTDA. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:20 am
” See Testimony of Nancy J. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:25 pm
” See Testimony of Nancy J. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:57 am
J. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
This court holds that it is not necessary to order a separate best interests hearing relative to (Vernon J. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench's relevant observations are set out as under: "........A wise exercise of judicial power inevitably takes care of the evil conseq [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Remember attorney Mitchell J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am
People caught in a cycle of addiction, crime and unemployment are as a practical matter unavailable for productive employment and responsible parenting of children they help bring into the world. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:40 am
by Lloyd J. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
Moreover, even " [m]isconduct that occurs before an attorney's discharge but is not discovered until after the discharge may serve as a basis for a fee forfeiture'" (Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d at 757, quoting Orendick v Chiodo, 272 AD2d 901, 902). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
John M. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Your choice does matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:17 am
by John J. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
Waxman apologized, and Justice Kagan started to ask a question, the Chief Justice persisted, “I’m still trying to get to the point of the fact that he was retiring. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
The court’s discretion in arts 34 and 36 implicates one of the basic issues in modern arbitration law, namely the extent of the court’s role in reviewing awards. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Canadian homeowners, residents, industry, regulators and appellate courts really do need certainty on the following key issues: (i) the threshold effect for liability m nuisance m the context of environmental or contamination; (ii) the requirements for a “non-natural” use ofland; (iii) whether environmental statutory regimes are a complete code of liability; and (iv) whether property devaluation should be a recognized claim in nuisance. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:19 am
John J. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
M/s. [read post]
