Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 70,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2014, 11:46 am
According to the Orlando Sentinel article, NeJame Law partner Mark NeJame said no one at his office sent the letters. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:44 pm
The Privacy Commissioner has released the following case notes: In Own Motion Investigation v Financial Institution [2009] PrivCmrA 12 the Commissioner commenced an own motion investigation after being advised by an individual that a financial institution had been sending bank account statements to the previous occupant of the individual's residential address for several years, despite these statements consistently being returned, marked ‘Return to sender. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
” In cases involving the intentional and unauthorized use of a counterfeit mark in commerce under § 1114(1)(a), the court must, unless it finds extenuating circumstances, enter judgment for three times defendant’s profits or plaintiff's damages, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:12 am
This sets a very high bar for 3D mark owners in infringement cases and we question whether this is consistent with EUCJ’s practice. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:43 pm
The Federal Circuit’s predecessor court – the CCPA – set out a series of factors in a case captioned In re E.I. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 7:56 am
But that's what happened after 26-year-old Hall County public defender Adam Levin, with help from colleague Brett Willis, argued the case of a homeless sex offender in front of the... [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
Nonuse for 3 consecutive years gives rise to a prima facie case of abandonment. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:27 pm
The fundamental question of the case seems to be how consumers perceive a person’s name when used on goods as a trade mark. [read post]
13 May 2012, 11:31 am
Catholic Healthcare West, doing business as Mark Twain St. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
Oh sure, we all begin with the statement in Marks v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:56 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterFrom Dennis Crouch: Carl Oppedahl lost his case to register the mark “patents.com. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Today marks the fourth and final day in this week’s pretrial hearing in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:14 pm
Today, my Damon Key colleagues Ken Kupchak, Mark Murakami, Matt Evans and I filed the Opening Brief in the latest phase of County of Hawaii v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:43 am
Plaintiff owns registrations for, among other marks, FRAGRANCENET and FRAGRANCENET.COM. [read post]
31 May 2020, 6:13 pm
Listed-group firms (which include many of the largest practices) appear to have far less contact with these types of clients, collectively gaining and losing just 67 and 45 cases, respectively, over the same period.Looking at individual firms, big ‘winners’ from transfers of cases include RnB IP, Wrays, and FPA Patent Attorneys, while the greatest net losses were experienced by firms including Cotters Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys, Pizzeys, FB Rice,… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:51 pm
Howard (Legal Data Scientist and Director of Analytics Services) and Jason Maples (Legal Data Analyst), the Report covers the years 2009 to date and begins with a brief summary defining what an ANDA case entails. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:36 am
The jury in that case recommended death. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Although all evidence submitted must be appreciated as a whole and entails a degree of interdependence between the relevant factors (time, place, extent and nature of use), in this case the trade mark proprietor had failed to provide evidence that would prove genuine use throughout that period of time. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:28 am
Mark P. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Mark S. [read post]
