Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 3341 - 3360 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2008, 3:46 pm
The critique is valid, things take a while, and now we'll see change; C. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  The Board, applying Section 102.111(c) of the Board's Rules whereby a document may be filed late "only upon good cause shown based on excusable neglect," rejected the response as untimely filed. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
In a similar vein, Ozcelik said to Tuncer, "That's why I'm telling you to stay away from everything for 4-5 months. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:21 pm
"The preconditions for deployment of Rule 804(b)(5) are formidable. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
What I'm about to write may therefore be doubly a waste of time:  (a) it's about the issue Watson derides; and (b) I haven't read Putnam, but I've read an interpretation of Putnam on this issue. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The evidence, if evidence be needed, is that we all - including the International Court of Justice - have frequently had occasion to turn to ILC studies on particular matters. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:41 am
I don't know who's to blame, and I'm not sure it matters. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:37 am
I'm just an 'ever so humble', if occasionally reluctant, reader of The Evening Standard. [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:29 pm
(b) When you state a conclusion, write the word "because" afterward to force yourself to state reasons, supporting evidence, etc. [read post]
14 May 2008, 11:55 am
(b) Rule of Construction- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to terminate any benefit available to any person except those benefits specifically terminated by the amendment made by subsection (a). [read post]