Search for: "People v Friend"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 7,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am
Indeed, the Republicans who control the Maine legislature are apparently resolutely doing what they can to avoid complying with the wishes of the people of Maine to reform their electoral system (just as, incidentally, they refuse to accept the people's verdict, in a referendum, to join Medicaid). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
In the evening I headed out to enjoy some hospitality with friends old and new. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 5:01 am
For example, in the case of Teetor v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Wool v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:05 am
In fact, my friend Sandy Levinson has argued that there are many parts of our Constitution that should be regarded as dealbreakers. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 1:45 pm
In 1979, the Supreme Court held in Bell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 2:42 pm
That’s the problem the court faced in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 9:35 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:45 am
The statute will — and is designed to — constrain people from communicating with other people in certain specified ways. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 9:17 am
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Nosal v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
Attorneys (AUSAs) filed a Government’s Sentencing Memorandum in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 9:17 am
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Nosal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
The case is Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:27 pm
Eneh v. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
People do disagree. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
(See Garland-Sash v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:37 am
Case Name: Negrette v. [read post]
