Search for: "People v. Wills" Results 3341 - 3360 of 5,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm by Jason Rantanen
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Taylor (K.B. 1769); Donaldson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Callahan, however, the Seaberg opinion makes clear that a waiver of the right to appeal will not be enforced unless it was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14]  The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15]  By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  At a minimum, controversial can’t mean that someone was willing to sue. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by Tom Goldstein
Jones could have real teeth if the majority were willing to make one other significant doctrinal move. [read post]