Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Canada’s Federal Court addressed this issue in H-D U.S.A., LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
Following the publication of the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) on 3 April 2014, which entered into force on 19 May 2014, EU Member States have two years to transpose its provisions in their national legislation. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Coal Development Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:25 am
Marshalls Service swept in and seized public records from a Florida police department in order to prevent them from being turned over as required by law in response to a request under the state's open-records law. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
On May 13, 2014, in Webb-Weber v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
State-owned or state-controlled companies that provide services to the public may meet this definition. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Concepcion (precluding states from requiring arbitration procedures inconsistent with the FAA, even if based on public policy considerations) and American Express Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The DOHMH made no changes to the initial proposal submitted to the public. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm
United States); whether it violates the “privileges or immunities” of a businessman who wants to operate a ferry service to be denied a permit to compete with an existing service on a public lake in Washington State (Courtney v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 4:57 am
Jefco Equipment Co., Inc. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:00 am
It's that time again... time to check in on the week's news in Suits by Suits: The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its opinion in Velazquez-Perez v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:32 am
Goltra, 293 U.S. 155 (1934), Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
The point has been made thoroughly and very persuasively by co-blogger Eugene: “[T]he freedom … of the press” specially protects the press as an industry, which is to say newspapers, television stations, and the like — so have argued some judges and scholars, such as the Citizens United v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:56 am
Spectrum Services Co. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:32 am
[P]unishing the press for its dissemination of information which is already publicly available is [also] relatively unlikely to advance the interests in the service of which the State seeks to act. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am
The first two appeals, R (Robinson) v Governor of HMP Whatton & Anor and R (Massey) v The Secretary of State for Justice will decide whether the appellants were arbitrarily detained in breach of ECHR, art 5 for failing to provide coursework needed to demonstrate that a prisoner service a sentence of imprisonment for public protection could safely be released. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
