Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 4,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 10:10 am
Zukowski v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:09 pm
As identified in People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:47 pm
I used the word Vapid on twitter last night and a fellow tweeter responded… I have another three words beginning with *V* which may usefully be employed to those who have watched the film Wall Street too many times…. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:48 am
" In People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:19 am
Totally embarrassed to have taken his eye off the ball, the IPKat realises that he hasn't said a single word about Proactive Sports Management Ltd v Wayne Rooney, Coleen Rooney, Stoneygate 48 Ltd and Speed 9849 Ltd -- a Queen's Bench Division for England and Wales decision of Judge Hegarty QC [2010] EWHC 1807 (QB) dating back to 15 July. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
In Seneca College v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
Garland v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 8:29 am
Won v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm
AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) – 7 Oct 2010. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
Garland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v Lockwood, 23 Misc… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:43 am
Georgia and McCleskey v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
The application of these principles is illustrated by the recent decision in Global BC v The Queen [2010] BCCA 169. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 3:09 am
Kassapides but on May 2, 2008, a jury in Queens County rendered a defense verdict finding that there was no malpractice. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:04 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
In Bray v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
BUCK AND QUEEN ISABELLA DEVELOPMENT JOINT VENTURE v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
There was a report on Byline Investigates concerning the CMC which took place on 11 June 2021 It was reported that The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have issued legal warnings against the BBC over a report that claimed the couple had not asked the Queen’s permission before naming their baby Lilibet. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
In Bray v. [read post]
